{"id":1634,"date":"2012-02-27T14:57:55","date_gmt":"2012-02-27T20:57:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bmovienation.com\/?p=1634"},"modified":"2012-02-27T14:57:55","modified_gmt":"2012-02-27T20:57:55","slug":"what-does-the-academy-have-against-fantasy-and-science-fiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.bmovienation.com\/?p=1634","title":{"rendered":"What does the Academy have against fantasy (and science fiction)?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

“Hugo” continued its dominance in the technical categories at the 84th Academy Awards as Rob Legato, Joss Williams, Ben Grossmann, and Alex Henning won the Oscar for Visual Effects. <\/p>\n

The \u201cHarry Potter\u201d movies have earned billions of dollars and delighted millions of moviegoers. And yet, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has treated them with a lack of respect bordering on contempt. <\/p>\n

Tim Burke, David Vickery, Greg Butler, and John Richardson were nominated for Best Visual Effects for \u201cHarry Potter and the Deathly Hallows\u2014Part 2,\u201d in a field that included Rob Legato, Joss Williams, Ben Grossmann, and Alex Henning for \u201cHugo,\u201d Erik Nash, John Rosengrant, Danny Gordon Taylor, and Swen Gillberg for \u201cReal Steel,\u201d Joe Letteri, Dan Lemmon, R. Christopher White, and Daniel Barrettfor \u201cRise of the Planet of the Apes\u201d and Scott Farrar, Scott Benza, Matthew E. Butler, and John Frazierfor \u201cTransformers: Dark of the Moon.\u201d
\nAdvertisement<\/p>\n

The only other nomination received by the critically lauded finale to the \u201cHarry Potter\u201d series was for makeup: Nick Dudman, Amanda Knight, and Lisa Tomblin were nominated against Martial Corneville, Lynn Johnson, and Matthew W. Mungle for \u201cAlbert Nobbs\u201d and Mark Coulier and J. Roy Helland for \u201cThe Iron Lady.\u201d That award was won by “The Iron Lady.”<\/p>\n

Note that the other nominees had major acting nominations. Generally, films that don’t have major acting nominations tend not to do well with the big awards, although “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” tied “Ben-Hur” and “Titanic” for most Oscars won by a single film (11) without any acting nominations. That\u2019s the exception, and not the rule.<\/p>\n

None of the \u201cHarry Potter\u201d movies has ever received an acting nomination. None has been nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, or Best Adapted Screenplay. \u201cHarry Potter and the Sorcerer\u2019s Stone\u201d was nominated for Best Art Direction, Costumes and Score. \u201cHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban\u201d was nominated for Best Visual Effects and Score. \u201cHarry Potter and the Goblet of Fire\u201d was nominated for Best Art Direction. \u201cHarry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince\u201d was nominated for Best Cinematography. \u201cHarry Potter and the Deathly Hallows\u2014Part 1\u201d was nominated for Best Visual Effects and Best Art Direction.<\/p>\n

And how many Oscars has the series won, you may wonder.<\/p>\n

None. Not a single Oscar has been awarded to the highest-grossing film franchise in history.<\/p>\n

Genre pictures have never done well with the Academy. Only 12 westerns have been nominated, including last year\u2019s “True Grit,\u201d and to date only 3 (“Cimarron,” “Dances With Wolves” and “Unforgiven”) have won. The Academy does not yet treat science fiction, let alone comic book adaptations with respect. Few science fiction movies have ever been nominated for Best Picture. None have won. Fantasy has fared slightly better, partly due to the “Lord of the Rings” movies. No comic book adaptation has yet been nominated for Best Picture.<\/p>\n

Alfred Hitchcock was largely perceived as a technical whiz whose films lacked depth. And he too was perceived as a genre director, although his field, the suspense thriller, is treated with slightly more respect now than when he was making them. (“Silence of the Lambs” did Best Picture. Hitchcock’s “Rebecca” also won Best Picture, in 1940, although the Academy may not have considered that a thriller.) <\/p>\n

The expanded slate of Best Picture nominees (there used to be only five) is largely a response to the well-deserved criticism received by the Academy after Christopher Nolan\u2019s \u201cThe Dark Knight\u201d received paltry nominations. Nolan may be the new Hitchcock. Last year\u2019s “Inception” was nominated for 8 Academy Awards: Best Picture, Best Original Screenplay (by Christopher Nolan), Art Direction, Cinematography (Wally Pfister), Best Score, Sound Mixing and Sound Editing, and Best Visual Effects, winning the awards for Best Cinematography, Sound Mixing, Sound Editing and Visual Effects. And that was the best any Nolan movie had ever done.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Wizard of Oz\u201d won Oscars for its score and Best Song. That was it. (Of course it was up against \u201cGone with the Wind.\u201d) \u201cThe Exorcist\u201d won Oscars for sound and Best Adapted Screenplay. Julie Andrews did win an Oscar for \u201cMary Poppins,\u201d partly because voters were so outraged over the fact that the creator of the role of Eliza Doolittle in \u201cMy Fair Lady\u201d was passed over for the role in the movie. She was going to get an Oscar thrown at her as soon as possible. \u201cMary Poppins\u201d also won four other Oscars, most of them for music, with an award for visual effects. \u201cIt\u2019s a Wonderful Life\u201d was nominated for four Oscars, and didn\u2019t win any. 1933\u2019s \u201cKing Kong,\u201d one of the most iconic movies ever made, wasn\u2019t nominated for a single Oscar. No, not even special effects.<\/p>\n

Science fiction has fared no better. \u201c2001: A Space Odyssey\u201d won an Oscar for visual effects. The groundbreaking 1968 \u201cPlanet of the Apes\u201d got an honorary Oscar for makeup. \u201cStar Wars\u201d actually has done the best of any science fiction movie, garnering six awards, for Art Direction, Costume Design, Visual Effects (no duh), Editing, Score and Sound. And to be honest, no one is going to look at \u201cStar Wars\u201d in retrospect and claim the actors got robbed.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King\u201d put the Academy in a bind. By the time the third installment came out, it was so painfully obvious that this was not only a lucrative commercial franchise, but a quality product and a stunning achievement of cinematic generalship, they had to give it some heavy metal. And still, not one award for acting. But it’s a lot more recognition than The Boy Who Lived is checking out with. Warner Bros. and the Harry Potter cast and filmmakers may just have to content themselves with the fact that their work has been seen and loved by millions, including an entire generation of college-aged kids who have literally grown up on it.<\/p>\n

Bob Hope is said to have once remarked about the commercially successful but often critically drubbed Cecil B. DeMille that he brought something new to the motion picture business: customers. And Harry Potter will have to be content with that.<\/p>\n

Continue reading on Examiner.com What does the Academy have against fantasy (and science fiction)? – National Fanboys | Examiner.com http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/fanboys-in-national\/what-does-the-academy-have-against-fantasy-and-science-fiction#ixzz1ncN6ZEVp<\/p>\n

\\from The Examiner im Dixon
\n